| Re: No animals "benefit" from farming: established fact! - CLICK HERE for the Pet Manual Forum Home Page |
| Rudy Canoza |
****wit David Harrison, stupid lying cracker, wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:11:29 GMT, demonmaster
<demonmaster@controls.you.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> ><none>
> >
> >On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Bruce Sinclair wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> In article <Pine.LNX.4.60.0503081403290.1719@qrzba.ybeq.yvirf>,
sales <sales@photoengineering.com> wrote:
> >> (snip)
> >>> Well the animals that survive have to live with the guilt of
allowing the
> >>> others to die. The conception of ignorance really doesn't exsist
any more
> >>> since there are very few places in this world where people do NOT
> >>> understand what is going on everywhere else in the world unless
mentally
> >>> incompetant. Nowadays its more of a moral question not a survival
question
> >>> on whether animals anywhere are ALLOWED to die. This brings in
the
> >>> question of spirituality since morals are usually based on some
sort of
> >>> god or religion no matter what the culture.
> >>
> >> ..and again, once you have shown animals are even slightly
spiritual, you
> >> might be able to argue that. Given that many religions say they
are not, you
> >> may well have a tough job :)
> >>
> >
> >Since I haven't read much of religous writings I cannot quote
specifics
> >however seems to me in the christian old and new testaments animals
are
> >mentioned quite a bit as being created and owned, I believe, by god
>
> To me this suggests that animals may also have another life after
> this one:
>
> Genesis 9
> 5 I will demand an accounting from every animal.
To me this suggests that you were just ****ting on the cafeteria table
when you wrote earlier about "If God exists..." You believe in the
most boneheaded, ****witted, fundamentalist white trash cracker concept
of God imaginable.
[snip ****wit's of cracker bible passages from memory]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
