| Re: No animals "benefit" from farming: fact! - CLICK HERE for the Pet Manual Forum Home Page |
| Rudy Canoza |
****wit David Harrison, stupid cracker, wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:32:44 GMT, demonmaster
<demonmaster@controls.you.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> ><none>
> >
> >On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 dh_ld@nomail.com wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:36:59 GMT, demonmaster
<demonmaster@controls.you.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> <none>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 dh_ld@nomail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:14:00 GMT, john
<john@photoengineering.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 dh_ld@nomail.com wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:07:05 GMT, Abner Gonad Canoza wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No animals "benefit" from farming
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Some do. Some don't. A person would have to be an
> >>>>>> idiot not to understand something as basic as that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How is starvation a benifit?
> >>>>
> >>>> What are you talking about?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Farming creates monocultures with huge negative imbalences in
ecological
> >>> systems. Without outside food production huge numbers of animals
would
> >>> starve. In other words -- crop failures in the US cause
starvation in
> >>> Africa. The GMOs have to raise their seeds somewhere. And yes,
sterile
> >>> seeds are one of the main causes of starvation around the world.
How is
> >>> this a benefit?
> >>
> >> In the cases where the animals die of starvation, I would put
them in
> >> the "Some don't." catagory. In other cases where the animals have
decent
> >> lives, I would put them in the "Some do." catagory.
> >>
> >
> >So...you do not regard spiruality a benefit?
>
> Sometimes it is and sometimes it's not, as with most things, imo.
Why?
No animal "benefits" from coming into existence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
