| Re: Car Sickness Problem - CLICK HERE for the Pet Manual Forum Home Page |
| Melanie |
"Just Molly" <oldmollyREMOVETHIS@tesco.net> wrote:
>
>"sm" <stewmorrnospam@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:hbmge0540er9lb3ul4toit3u65o9l5vnno@4ax.com...
>> Hi there,
>> Our six-month-old border collie hates the car. Even sitting in it,
>> engine not running, he'll be sick within a few minutes. Any
>> suggestions for a cure?
>> Thanks,
>> SM
> Some dogs never get cured. My tibetan spaniel also get sick just sitting in
>a non runing car and she is 9 now.
Try letting it go in someone else's car, perhaps someone who
takes a bit more pride in their personal hygiene and bathes with
soap and water at least once a week. Your dog probably "gets
sick" due to being in close proximity to the stench of your rank,
unwashed, droopy old welly-top of a ****.
And clear all those flies and maggots that buzz around you, you
sick pet-sex abusing bitch.
Abuse Report Filed
|
|
|
| Melanie |
"Just Molly" <oldmollyREMOVETHIS@tesco.net> wrote:
>
>"Melanie" <mell@aol79997344373788954328.com> wrote in > And clear all those
>flies and maggots that buzz around you,
>
> P.S. maggots don't buzz.
You should know you filthy old bag.
Abuse Report Filed
|
|
|
| Melany |
"Just Molly" <oldmollyREMOVETHIS@tesco.net> wrote:
>"Melanie" <mell@aol79997344373788954328.com> wrote in message > > I notice
>that you are too cowardly to post using your full details.
>>
>> What details?
>>
> Well not hiding behind an anonymous host for example. Trying to hide who
>your ISP is so that nobody reports you for off topic posting and
>crossposting.
What utter bollocks. My "ISP" is Zen Internet, here
www.zen.co.uk report away you sad twat.
> As I said. A coward.
What you fail to grasp, because you are both stupid and
self-opinionated, is that I use a news provder (not ISP) that
supports its own customers first, and won't pander to every
little netkkkkop that doesn't like swearing or "off topic posting
and crossposting."
The difference is, that I won't go crying to your "ISP" if you do
something I don't like. That's because I'm not a coward, but you
*clearly* are, miss crybaby.
>Funny how you only have the balls to post from behind an anonymous posting
>host. You would definately never have the guts to say to my face what you
>have said here. Now ain't THAT the truth?
0870 7410524 <-- Try me, you old windbag.
> Scaredy pants, coward.
We'll see.
My posts are here, I am here and easily identifiable. This is an
electronic communications medium which affords publicly published
conversations. You've been all too happy to slate others' when
asked for help in 'your' little group. But when you get the
repercussions you deserve, you start crying because now it's "not
fair".
Well tough! Life's like that, you old twat.
Abuse Report Filed
|
|
|
| Mike |
"Just Molly" <oldmollyREMOVETHIS@tesco.net> wrote:
>"Melany" <melll@oal7982937492328.com> wrote in message
>> >that you are too cowardly to post using your full details.
>> >>
>> >> What details?
>> >>
>> > Well not hiding behind an anonymous host for example. Trying to hide who
>> >your ISP is so that nobody reports you for off topic posting and
>> >crossposting.
>>
>> What utter bollocks. My "ISP" is Zen Internet, here
>> www.zen.co.uk report away you sad twat.
>>
>> > As I said. A coward.
>>
>> What you fail to grasp, because you are both stupid and
>> self-opinionated, is that I use a news provder (not ISP) that
>> supports its own customers first, and won't pander to every
>> little netkkkkop that doesn't like swearing or "off topic posting
>> and crossposting."
>>
> Nothing to do with swearing. It is to do with defamation of character. In
>short I want to sue you :0)
Really, we'll see about that...
>> >Funny how you only have the balls to post from behind an anonymous posting
>> >host. You would definately never have the guts to say to my face what you
>> >have said here. Now ain't THAT the truth?
>>
>> 0870 7410524 <-- Try me, you old windbag.
>> ROFL again, to scred to supply anything traceable.
This part of the post is not about "traceable", it's about
calling you a twat. Do you expect me to publish a private contact
number on usenet, just to satisfy your mistaken opinion about
what consitutes cowardice? I'm neither a coward nor a ****wit.
You said: "would never have the guts to say to my face what you
have said here".. I have now given you the opportunity to prove
your claims. You can start by calling me on that number, and
asking for Mike. If you can't afford the call, publish your
number and I'll call you. If you then want true "face to face"
contact, I will happily oblige.
If you decline, then you have failed in your attempts to prove
your own point. And decline you will, because you are a sad,
smelly, bullying old bitch.
>> > Scaredy pants, coward.
>>
>> We'll see.
> We already have.
No, we have not; please do try and keep up.
>> My posts are here, I am here and easily identifiable. This is an
>> electronic communications medium which affords publicly published
>> conversations.
> You post your libel anonymously because you *know* they are lies and you
>know that if you were traceable I would take legal action. In other words,
>you are pissing yourself at the thought. Scaredy pants.
I am pissing myself, but not for the reasons you mention. It's
called "laughter", and I really do HTH.
As for the 'I know you would take legal action' bit; I know
nothing of the sort. What I do know is that you go around
insulting people and then get into all sorts of trouble where you
are obviously out of your depth. However, if you wish to prove me
wrong, try this.. How much were you awarded in damages for
this...
From: "oldmolly" <oldmolly@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups: uk.rec.pets.misc
Subject: Re: Oldmolly charged with cruelty to animals
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:07:10 -0000
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <b0k5j5$qa6nk$1@ID-165698.news.dfncis.de>
References: <b0isdd$pem1c$1@ID-117236.news.dfncis.de>
<398q2v8v9jcltcr7f5p04c0g2qsj2eveif@4ax.com>
<1043146732.84160.0@iapetus.uk.clara.net>
<uwnof6awuwy.fsf@cs.man.ac.uk>
<1043152162.50202.0@despina.uk.clara.net>
Reply-To: "oldmolly" <oldmolly@ntlworld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: m125-mp1.cvx2-b.nth.dial.ntli.net
(62.253.52.125)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1043175846 27597556 62.253.52.125 (16
[165698])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
"Chris" <see@reply.to.field> wrote in message
news:1043152162.50202.0@despina.uk.clara.net...
> In article <uwnof6awuwy.fsf@cs.man.ac.uk>, alanrw@cs.man.ac.uk says...
> : Chris <see@reply.to.field> writes:
> : > : >
> : > : Abuse report filed with abuse@energis.com
> : > :
> : > What for?
> :
> : Presumably libel.
>
> I'm sorry, but this is not a reason to report someone. Alledged libel's
> must be actioned solely by the plaintiff (ie, the person who claims to
> have been libeled). Bob has neither been libeled nor would he be the
> plaintiff. Therefore, this is none of his business.
>
> : Unless energis act upon the report, they are as
> : responsible as "nu-nu"
>
> No, they're not at _all_ ! A third party cannot complain about the
> alledged libel of another individual. He can bring someone's attention
> to it, but unless a complaint is made then the ISP is not compelled to
> act.
>
> : and would be named in any libel action.
>
> ..and so would all the other ISPs who have carried and propogated the
> article, if they failed to remove the article from their servers.
>
> : By
> : reporting "nu-nu"'s post to energis, Bob is actually doing them a
> : favour.
>
> He is not. He is wasting their time.
>
> btw - you quoted the original post in your message. Technically, this
> means you've re-published the "libel". Meaning you could be sued.
> Silly, eh?
I have contacted the energis abuse people asking for details of
the poster.
I have also informed them of my intent to start legal proceedings
against
the poster. I will be printing of the original post and getting
in touch
with my solicitor tomorrow morning. I am *not* going to let this
ne pass.
The money I win in court should pay for a nice new aviary block
to house the
smaller birds.
I am in fact on very good terms with my local animal welfare
officer here.
If I had indeed been prosecuted by the RSPCA, I'm sure that
Chester zoo
would not be bringing me a bird in a weeks time to become part of
a breeding
programme here.
// ====end copy==== //
So, how did you go on with the one that you were " *not* going to
let go" ??
Ignoring my question will be futher indication of your
****wittedness. Admitting that "Chris" was correct and that you
are a twat, would be a start on your road to recovery.
>>You've been all too happy to slate others' when
>> asked for help in 'your' little group.
>*My* little group? Which group would that be?
The one that remains when you've removed the others.
>>But when you get the
>> repercussions you deserve, you start crying because now it's "not
>> fair".
>>
> I never said that. I object to having my character maligned by your lies.
There are no lies; there's just you, and you're a ****wit.
> What you don't seem to realise is that several people who post on the
>groups I do, have actually met me and visited my home and seen how my
>animals are kept. So they know that you are a liar and a coward.
I doubt that they know me at all, never mind any thoughts about
my character.
>> Abuse Report Filed
> to whom?
Same people your old pal Brenchley used, I guess.
Abuse Report Filed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
