ping john alan larkin (aka cap, the park ranger)

Archive > Pet newsgroups > alt.pets.ferrets

Pages: [1] 2

ping john alan larkin (aka cap, the park ranger) - CLICK HERE for the Pet Manual Forum Home Page

the r0ck who stole christmas

why is it you and your wife never had kids?

ZPL

This one really pisses me off, Gary. In this day and age of MANkind, one is
not required to produce children to be "fulfilled".

Why is it that YOU don't have any children, Gary?

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> why is it you and your wife never had kids?

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> This one really pisses me off, Gary. In this day and age of MANkind, one is
> not required to produce children to be "fulfilled".
>
> Why is it that YOU don't have any children, Gary?
>
> "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
> news:Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
>>why is it you and your wife never had kids?
>
>
>

thank you, mister helper, but the question wasn't addressed to your
sorry ass.

a husband and wife will usually choose to have kids - either by giving
birth or through adoption. the fact that John Alan Larkin and his
lovely wife Karen haven't at this stage in their life suggests that
either he's shooting blanks (sterile) or his wife is defective.

have you had sexual relations with his wife? if so, did she tell you
not to wear a condom?

Nanny

Because it was too expensive to clone himself.

Nanny

"ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> schreef in bericht
news:WcmEb.58228$cQ.12045@okepread05...
> This one really pisses me off, Gary. In this day and age of MANkind, one
is
> not required to produce children to be "fulfilled".
>
> Why is it that YOU don't have any children, Gary?
>
> "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
message
> news:Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > why is it you and your wife never had kids?
>
>

ZPL

Again, tight minded assumptions. Last time I heard, the best population
control was abstinence. Which, I take (hopefully) that you are currently
practicing.

Give me man that has had a vasectomy anytime.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:ahmEb.18347$G9.5856@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > This one really pisses me off, Gary. In this day and age of MANkind,
one is
> > not required to produce children to be "fulfilled".
> >
> > Why is it that YOU don't have any children, Gary?
> >
> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
message
> > news:Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> >
> >>why is it you and your wife never had kids?
> >
> >
> >
>
> thank you, mister helper, but the question wasn't addressed to your
> sorry ass.
>
> a husband and wife will usually choose to have kids - either by giving
> birth or through adoption. the fact that John Alan Larkin and his
> lovely wife Karen haven't at this stage in their life suggests that
> either he's shooting blanks (sterile) or his wife is defective.
>
> have you had sexual relations with his wife? if so, did she tell you
> not to wear a condom?

ZPL

Oh - and the last time I looked at my taxes, I seem to be supporting
everyone else's kids along with a good number of their parents.

"ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message news:SYmEb.58233$cQ.47195@okepread05...
> Again, tight minded assumptions. Last time I heard, the best population
> control was abstinence. Which, I take (hopefully) that you are currently
> practicing.
>
> Give me man that has had a vasectomy anytime.
>
>
>
>
>
> "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
message
> news:ahmEb.18347$G9.5856@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > ZPL wrote:
> >
> > > This one really pisses me off, Gary. In this day and age of MANkind,
> one is
> > > not required to produce children to be "fulfilled".
> > >
> > > Why is it that YOU don't have any children, Gary?
> > >
> > > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
> message
> > > news:Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > >
> > >>why is it you and your wife never had kids?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > thank you, mister helper, but the question wasn't addressed to your
> > sorry ass.
> >
> > a husband and wife will usually choose to have kids - either by giving
> > birth or through adoption. the fact that John Alan Larkin and his
> > lovely wife Karen haven't at this stage in their life suggests that
> > either he's shooting blanks (sterile) or his wife is defective.
> >
> > have you had sexual relations with his wife? if so, did she tell you
> > not to wear a condom?
>
>

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:
> Again, tight minded assumptions. Last time I heard, the best population
> control was abstinence. Which, I take (hopefully) that you are currently
> practicing.
>
> Give me man that has had a vasectomy anytime.

so, you're saying his gene pool was so substandard that he got a vasectomy?

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> Oh - and the last time I looked at my taxes, I seem to be supporting
> everyone else's kids along with a good number of their parents.

all about you, you, you.

you aren't the topic of conversation here. kindly stand in line and
wait your turn.

ZPL

This is a public forum. We have stood by and for the most part ignored your
tirades concerning religion and war. You're wasting my bandwidth.

Oh, I forgot. You are a card carrying member of the God club.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:e7nEb.18363$G9.5845@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > Oh - and the last time I looked at my taxes, I seem to be supporting
> > everyone else's kids along with a good number of their parents.
>
> all about you, you, you.
>
> you aren't the topic of conversation here. kindly stand in line and
> wait your turn.

ZPL

I am saying that your DNA is polluting my gene pool.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:t6nEb.18362$G9.2116@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
> > Again, tight minded assumptions. Last time I heard, the best population
> > control was abstinence. Which, I take (hopefully) that you are
currently
> > practicing.
> >
> > Give me man that has had a vasectomy anytime.
>
> so, you're saying his gene pool was so substandard that he got a
vasectomy?

ZPL

yes, it is all me, me, me...after I am done coughing up money to support you
and your family.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:e7nEb.18363$G9.5845@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > Oh - and the last time I looked at my taxes, I seem to be supporting
> > everyone else's kids along with a good number of their parents.
>
> all about you, you, you.
>
> you aren't the topic of conversation here. kindly stand in line and
> wait your turn.

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> This is a public forum. We have stood by and for the most part ignored your
> tirades concerning religion and war. You're wasting my bandwidth.

Again with you, you, you. This isn't alt.pets.zpl.

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> I am saying that your DNA is polluting my gene pool.

you enjoy talking about yourself, don't you?

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> yes, it is all me, me, me...

confession is good for the soul.

> after I am done coughing up money to support you
> and your family.

how can you make such an absurd claim? you don't even know me. Unlike
John Alan Larkin, I have sex with my wife regularly. Unlike his
defective wife, Karen, my wife can have kids. We have two.

How many have you given to your husband?

ZPL

Last time I checked, there was no husband in this house. Never has been. I
am getting to the age where my ovaries rattle, but I don't have to deal with
"the man of the house".

You can thank me for paying for your WIC, Medicaid, and for the school your
children attend by paying back into the system that you got assistance from
while you were out of work.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:ZwnEb.18413$G9.17704@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > yes, it is all me, me, me...
>
> confession is good for the soul.
>
> > after I am done coughing up money to support you
> > and your family.
>
> how can you make such an absurd claim? you don't even know me. Unlike
> John Alan Larkin, I have sex with my wife regularly. Unlike his
> defective wife, Karen, my wife can have kids. We have two.
>
> How many have you given to your husband?

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> Last time I checked, there was no husband in this house. Never has been. I
> am getting to the age where my ovaries rattle, but I don't have to deal with
> "the man of the house".

so, you abstain from all sex? how long as it been since you've been
with a man? And Cap doesn't count.

> You can thank me for paying for your WIC, Medicaid, and for the school your
> children attend by paying back into the system that you got assistance from
> while you were out of work.

such a statement would imply that i've been out of work and had to rely
on state assistance. wrong again.

Lin

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
>
> How many have you given to your husband?

"Given"????????

Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......

If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her somewhat, then I gots
news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a flaming
****heel).....

ZPL

Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary who
stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or purchase a
higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work? And that
statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that as he
has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything else?

Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:%YnEb.18735$I6.2732@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > Last time I checked, there was no husband in this house. Never has
been. I
> > am getting to the age where my ovaries rattle, but I don't have to deal
with
> > "the man of the house".
>
> so, you abstain from all sex? how long as it been since you've been
> with a man? And Cap doesn't count.
>
> > You can thank me for paying for your WIC, Medicaid, and for the school
your
> > children attend by paying back into the system that you got assistance
from
> > while you were out of work.
>
> such a statement would imply that i've been out of work and had to rely
> on state assistance. wrong again.
>

the r0ck who stole christmas

Lin wrote:
> "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
>
>>How many have you given to your husband?
>
>
> "Given"????????

ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.

> Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......
>
> If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her somewhat, then I gots
> news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a flaming
> ****heel).....

"gots" ? you criticize me for using "given" yet you can't bothered to
use proper english in your reply? are you lazy or just stupid?

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary who
> stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or purchase a
> higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work?

who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
leave you at the alter?

> And that
> statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that as he
> has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything else?

you must be high...or off your meds.

> Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.

now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
sex in ages" zpl.

ZPL

Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:AToEb.18698$G9.17831@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary who
> > stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or
purchase a
> > higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work?
>
> who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
> leave you at the alter?
>
> > And that
> > statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that as
he
> > has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything
else?
>
> you must be high...or off your meds.
>
> > Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.
>
> now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
> sex in ages" zpl.

Lin

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> Lin wrote:
> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
> >
> >>How many have you given to your husband?
> >
> >
> > "Given"????????
>
> ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
>
>
> > Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......
> >
> > If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her somewhat, then I
gots
> > news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a flaming
> > ****heel).....
>
> "gots" ? you criticize me for using "given" yet you can't bothered to
> use proper english in your reply? are you lazy or just stupid?

Are you too lazy or just too stupid to capitolize the beginning of
sentences, or proper names of countries & languages?

And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.

Y-A-A-A-A-W-N........

ZPL

I guess I stepped into that one.

My apologies to Mr. r0ck for many of my references. Not all of them,
however.

I just wish people would have the balls to keep themselves identifiable. At
least in Letters to the Editor you have to list your name and place of
residence.

"Lin" <ktnil@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
news:f0qEb.7169$031.2477@fe3.columbus.rr.com...
> I thought maybe it was Debbie, but even *it's* English is too good. Must
be
> one of her syphilitic buds from down on the docks.
>
> "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message
news:7UpEb.59227$cQ.42787@okepread05...
> > Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
> > trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.
> >
> >
> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
> message
> > news:AToEb.18698$G9.17831@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > > ZPL wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary
who
> > > > stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or
> > purchase a
> > > > higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work?
> > >
> > > who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
> > > leave you at the alter?
> > >
> > > > And that
> > > > statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that
as
> > he
> > > > has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything
> > else?
> > >
> > > you must be high...or off your meds.
> > >
> > > > Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.
> > >
> > > now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
> > > sex in ages" zpl.
> >
> >
>
>

Cap

the r0ck who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message news:<Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
> why is it you and your wife never had kids?

Well Rock-it-scientist, I happen to have a boy serving with 3rd ID,
and soon to be back from Iraq doing something you would never have the
nerve to do, or insightfulness to understand. Do try to do better. I
hate you to come off looking more than the moron you are. You're
mentally crippled enough as it is. They have drugs and therapy to help
you control that you know.

For somebody speaking about somebody not having any life you sure seem
to spend an extraordinary amount of time focusing on me and mine. I
must have really twisted you chain. I'll bet you spent your entire day
focused on little ol' me. How flattering.

While you were busy looking up public info on me (big time hacker), I
was instructing an A license skydiving class in Alabama, and doing a
few tandems. Afterwards we took a couple from 14k. Come on down, I
have a rig just for you.

You really do need to get out more. You can do it if you try.
Really you can...

Cap

the r0ck who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message news:<ZwnEb.18413$G9.17704@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > yes, it is all me, me, me...
>
> confession is good for the soul.
>
> > after I am done coughing up money to support you
> > and your family.
>
> how can you make such an absurd claim? you don't even know me. Unlike
> John Alan Larkin, I have sex with my wife regularly. Unlike his
> defective wife, Karen, my wife can have kids. We have two.
>
> How many have you given to your husband?

You sure seem to have a need to proclaim this rather loudly, and
puppies don't count Rock-it-boi.

And my daughter Jessica who is 16 says to tell you you're an idiot.
Pretty perceptive for such a young lady don't you think?

Isotope

"ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message news:hjnEb.58237$cQ.20596@okepread05...
> This is a public forum. We have stood by and for the most part ignored
your
> tirades concerning religion and war. You're wasting my bandwidth.

And ignore it still.... it may be rubbish but it seems like harmless (at
leat to ferrets in general) rubbish. It's like the Christina Aguilera in the
nude spam posts.... worthless ****e to be passed over (ok, I concede... some
people may like that kind of thing) The only reason I respond now is because
this thread has got stupidly long and I am trying to catch up here in a rare
free moment on ferret talk!!

Isotope (damn it! And I made the stoopid thread even longer. Drat!)

the r0ck who stole christmas

In-Reply-To: <7UpEb.59227$cQ.42787@okepread05>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <bCsEb.19846$G9.14530@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:36:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.88.69.233
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrddc01.gnilink.net 1071797767 138.88.69.233 (Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:36:07 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:36:07 EST
Path: text-east!propagator-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!cyclone.bc.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!nwrddc01.gnilink.net.POSTED!d90c283a!not-for-mail
Xref: 127.0.0.1 alt.hackers.malicious:384201 alt.pets.ferrets:164367

ZPL wrote:

> Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
> trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.

who's acting mature now? "Get the **** off the ferret board"?

you didn't answer the questions:

>>who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
>>leave you at the alter?

and

>>now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
>>sex in ages" zpl.

the r0ck who stole christmas

Lin wrote:

> "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
> news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
>>Lin wrote:
>>
>>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
>>>
>>>>How many have you given to your husband?
>>>
>>>
>>>"Given"????????
>>
>>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......
>>>
>>>If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her somewhat, then I
>
> gots
>
>>>news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a flaming
>>>****heel).....
>>
>>"gots" ? you criticize me for using "given" yet you can't bothered to
>>use proper english in your reply? are you lazy or just stupid?
>
>
> Are you too lazy or just too stupid to capitolize the beginning of
> sentences, or proper names of countries & languages?

ah, the english major can't spell. then you have no room to criticize
anybody about anything. hypocrite.

>
> And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.

where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things? would you
like me to read my reply slowly so you can understand?

the r0ck who stole christmas

Lin wrote:

> I thought maybe it was Debbie, but even *it's* English is too good. Must be
> one of her syphilitic buds from down on the docks.

you're familar with the "buds" from "down on the docks"? are you the
common whore or just a follower of John Alan Larkin, aka Cap?

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> I guess I stepped into that one.
>
> My apologies to Mr. r0ck for many of my references. Not all of them,
> however.

fine. apology accepted. now, mind your own business while i dissect
that clown, Cap.

> I just wish people would have the balls to keep themselves identifiable. At
> least in Letters to the Editor you have to list your name and place of
> residence.

you are a raging hypocrite, aren't you? you whine about people not
signing their names when they post to usenet yet you sign "ZPL".

go away, kid, you bother me.

the r0ck who stole christmas

Cap wrote:

> the r0ck who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message news:<Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
>
>>why is it you and your wife never had kids?
>
>
> Well Rock-it-scientist, I happen to have a boy serving with 3rd ID,

liar. i just mentioned the 3 Inf Div in a separate post and now you
convinently happen to have a kid with the 3Inf Div? Please try to make
your lies more believable.

> and soon to be back from Iraq doing something you would never have the
> nerve to do, or insightfulness to understand. Do try to do better. I
> hate you to come off looking more than the moron you are. You're
> mentally crippled enough as it is. They have drugs and therapy to help
> you control that you know.

whatever you say, Private Pyle. most of the 3 Inf Div rotated home for
R&R. Why didn't your "kid"? Perhaps because he doesn't really exist?
Are you living your life vicariously through a real man again?

> For somebody speaking about somebody not having any life you sure seem
> to spend an extraordinary amount of time focusing on me and mine. I
> must have really twisted you chain. I'll bet you spent your entire day
> focused on little ol' me. How flattering.

15 minutes of google = your life. That's just sad.

> While you were busy looking up public info on me (big time hacker), I
> was instructing an A license skydiving class in Alabama, and doing a
> few tandems. Afterwards we took a couple from 14k. Come on down, I
> have a rig just for you.

how is it that a dunce like Debbie could "hack" your computer and post
the pics of your wife?

you've got to be a complete moron to be hacked by Debbie.

the r0ck who stole christmas

Cap wrote:

> the r0ck who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message news:<ZwnEb.18413$G9.17704@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
>
>>ZPL wrote:
>>
>>
>>>yes, it is all me, me, me...
>>
>>confession is good for the soul.
>>
>>
>>>after I am done coughing up money to support you
>>>and your family.
>>
>>how can you make such an absurd claim? you don't even know me. Unlike
>>John Alan Larkin, I have sex with my wife regularly. Unlike his
>>defective wife, Karen, my wife can have kids. We have two.
>>
>>How many have you given to your husband?
>
>
> You sure seem to have a need to proclaim this rather loudly, and
> puppies don't count Rock-it-boi.
>
> And my daughter Jessica who is 16 says to tell you you're an idiot.
> Pretty perceptive for such a young lady don't you think?

so now you have a daughter instead of a son? were you lying when you
said you had no kids only 2 years ago or are you lying now?

the r0ck who stole christmas

Isotope wrote:

> "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message news:hjnEb.58237$cQ.20596@okepread05...
>
>>This is a public forum. We have stood by and for the most part ignored
>
> your
>
>>tirades concerning religion and war. You're wasting my bandwidth.
>
>
> And ignore it still.... it may be rubbish but it seems like harmless (at
> leat to ferrets in general) rubbish. It's like the Christina Aguilera in the
> nude spam posts.... worthless ****e to be passed over (ok, I concede... some
> people may like that kind of thing) The only reason I respond now is because
> this thread has got stupidly long and I am trying to catch up here in a rare
> free moment on ferret talk!!
>
> Isotope (damn it! And I made the stoopid thread even longer. Drat!)

ask cap how he magically created two kids who are 18+ and 16 years old
in only two years. he knows MAGIC. *snort*

Cap, be honest, your wife has ovarian cancer, doesn't she? that's why
she can't have kids? nobody will laugh, go ahead.

ZVI WOLFE

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:38:29 GMT, in alt.hackers.malicious, the r0ck
who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote:

-> Lin wrote:
->
-> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote
in message
-> > news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
-> >
-> >>Lin wrote:
-> >>
-> >>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
-> >>>
-> >>>>How many have you given to your husband?
-> >>>
-> >>>
-> >>>"Given"????????
-> >>
-> >>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
-> >>

<snip>

-> >
-> > And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.
->
-> where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things? would
you
-> like me to read my reply slowly so you can understand?

FYI, a lark is a bird. Dip****.

ZPL

Makes you wonder what ZPL is for, doesn't it? Not everything is "code"
baby.

And leave Cap alone. We like him here.

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:gHsEb.19860$G9.2188@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> ZPL wrote:
>
> > I guess I stepped into that one.
> >
> > My apologies to Mr. r0ck for many of my references. Not all of them,
> > however.
>
> fine. apology accepted. now, mind your own business while i dissect
> that clown, Cap.
>
> > I just wish people would have the balls to keep themselves identifiable.
At
> > least in Letters to the Editor you have to list your name and place of
> > residence.
>
> you are a raging hypocrite, aren't you? you whine about people not
> signing their names when they post to usenet yet you sign "ZPL".
>
> go away, kid, you bother me.
>
>
>

the r0ck who stole christmas

ZPL wrote:

> Makes you wonder what ZPL is for, doesn't it? Not everything is "code"
> baby.

I couldn't care less. I only pointed it out because you're the queen of
hypocracy.

> And leave Cap alone. We like him here.

Cap is a lying putz. the only reason he has ferrets is because his wife
is defective and can't have kids.

Lin

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:pEsEb.19851$G9.2984@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> Lin wrote:
>
> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
message
> > news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> >
> >>Lin wrote:
> >>
> >>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
> >>>
> >>>>How many have you given to your husband?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"Given"????????
> >>
> >>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......
> >>>
> >>>If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her somewhat, then I
> >
> > gots
> >
> >>>news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a flaming
> >>>****heel).....
> >>
> >>"gots" ? you criticize me for using "given" yet you can't bothered to
> >>use proper english in your reply? are you lazy or just stupid?
> >
> >
> > Are you too lazy or just too stupid to capitolize the beginning of
> > sentences, or proper names of countries & languages?
>
> ah, the english major can't spell. then you have no room to criticize
> anybody about anything. hypocrite.

Who's the English major? Not me. My degree's in Psychology.
>
> >
> > And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.
>
> where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things? would you
> like me to read my reply slowly so you can understand?

To quote: "ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion."

Why don't you find someplace where someone gives a **** about what you
think?

Lin

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:DFsEb.19855$G9.4277@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> Lin wrote:
>
> > I thought maybe it was Debbie, but even *it's* English is too good. Must
be
> > one of her syphilitic buds from down on the docks.
>
> you're familar with the "buds" from "down on the docks"? are you the
> common whore or just a follower of John Alan Larkin, aka Cap?

I don't "follow" anyone but my own self. Unlike you.

swamp

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:48:44 GMT, the r0ck who stole christmas
<r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote:

>Isotope wrote:
>
>> "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message news:hjnEb.58237$cQ.20596@okepread05...
>>
>>>This is a public forum. We have stood by and for the most part ignored
>>
>> your
>>
>>>tirades concerning religion and war. You're wasting my bandwidth.
>>
>>
>> And ignore it still.... it may be rubbish but it seems like harmless (at
>> leat to ferrets in general) rubbish. It's like the Christina Aguilera in the
>> nude spam posts.... worthless ****e to be passed over (ok, I concede... some
>> people may like that kind of thing) The only reason I respond now is because
>> this thread has got stupidly long and I am trying to catch up here in a rare
>> free moment on ferret talk!!
>>
>> Isotope (damn it! And I made the stoopid thread even longer. Drat!)

[snip]

>in only two years. he knows MAGIC. *snort*

Who's into magic? There's no such thing.

>Cap, be honest...

[snip]

What does this have to do w/ anything on any ferret ng/board?

Keep it on ahm,

-- swamp

"Who, me officer? What's a ferut? These guys?? No, they're Polish cats."

swamp

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:45:45 GMT, the r0ck who stole christmas
<r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote:

>you've got to be a complete moron to be hacked by Debbie.

....and you've got to be a bigger moron to care..dot..dot..dot.

Once again, time to clean the ferret cage,

-- swamp

"Who, me officer? What's a ferut? These guys?? No, they're Polish cats."

The r0ck who st0le Christmas

ZVI WOLFE wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:38:29 GMT, in alt.hackers.malicious, the r0ck
> who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote:
>
> -> Lin wrote:
> ->
> -> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote
> in message
> -> > news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> -> >
> -> >>Lin wrote:
> -> >>
> -> >>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
> -> >>>
> -> >>>>How many have you given to your husband?
> -> >>>
> -> >>>
> -> >>>"Given"????????
> -> >>
> -> >>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
> -> >>
>
> <snip>
>
> -> >
> -> > And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.
> ->
> -> where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things? would
> you
> -> like me to read my reply slowly so you can understand?
>
> FYI, a lark is a bird. Dip****.

well...golly gee! how about that! the english major who can't spell can
lookup a word in a dictionary. you should try reading more. a lark can
also refer to a prank or a joke...which...wait for it...wait for it...

you are!

now, crawl back into that diseased cesspool you call a home and bring me the
other clown. you bore me.

Whoa there...My sister and her husband made a conscious decision to never have
children. And they haven't.

Perhaps Karen and Cap made that decision as well.

In any case, whether or not either are fertile, is of no never mind...I don't see
that as a big deal, relating to outsiders. However, as neither of them have made
any mention of such unfortunate happenstance's, it is either none of our freaking
business, or it is not the case.

So stuff it!

the r0ck who stole christmas wrote:

> thank you, mister helper, but the question wasn't addressed to your
> sorry ass.
>
> a husband and wife will usually choose to have kids - either by giving
> birth or through adoption. the fact that John Alan Larkin and his
> lovely wife Karen haven't at this stage in their life suggests that
> either he's shooting blanks (sterile) or his wife is defective.
>
> have you had sexual relations with his wife? if so, did she tell you
> not to wear a condom?

Isotope wrote:

> And ignore it still.... it may be rubbish but it seems like harmless (at
> leat to ferrets in general) rubbish. It's like the Christina Aguilera in the
> nude spam posts....

HUH?

WHERE??!! Wha'd I miss!!

Damn it all...I have known about Jessica for quite some time...at least 3 years. BikerFerret has even met her.

Two ferrets that were here with me for a bit know her! LOL...she helps with taking care of them! (Among others!)

Jessica..you are pretty figment of everyone's imagination.....HAHAHA!!

MC (Yup...I am known by those letters...good as my name..have been for 30 plus years!)

> so now you have a daughter instead of a son? were you lying when you
> said you had no kids only 2 years ago or are you lying now?

Ilena Ayala

(Note to apfers from Ilena: more at bottom; ahmers bottom post)

"Lin" <ktnil@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
news:f0qEb.7169$031.2477@fe3.columbus.rr.com...
> I thought maybe it was Debbie, but even *it's* English is too good. Must
be
> one of her syphilitic buds from down on the docks.
>
> "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message
news:7UpEb.59227$cQ.42787@okepread05...
> > Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
> > trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.
> >
> >
> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
> message
> > news:AToEb.18698$G9.17831@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > > ZPL wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary
who
> > > > stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or
> > purchase a
> > > > higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work?
> > >
> > > who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
> > > leave you at the alter?
> > >
> > > > And that
> > > > statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that
as
> > he
> > > > has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything
> > else?
> > >
> > > you must be high...or off your meds.
> > >
> > > > Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.
> > >
> > > now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
> > > sex in ages" zpl.

It's a reg in ahm who goes by r0ck, not Debbie (trust me, she's up to no
good elsewhere tonight).

r0ck, what's up with this? Are you going to flirt with Debbie/Tracker now?

Cap is one of the *good* guys. And you should not make any assumptions (or
*cough* SE attempts *cough*) regarding info on any children he and/or his
wife may or may not have.

-Ilena Ayala

Ilena Ayala

"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
news:dLsEb.19867$G9.5763@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> Cap wrote:
>
> > the r0ck who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
message news:<Q1mEb.18341$G9.12263@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
> >
> >>why is it you and your wife never had kids?
> >
> >
> > Well Rock-it-scientist, I happen to have a boy serving with 3rd ID,
>
> liar. i just mentioned the 3 Inf Div in a separate post and now you
> convinently happen to have a kid with the 3Inf Div? Please try to make
> your lies more believable.

Hey r0ck, It is not something he suddenly came up with to mirror something
you posted. He posted about it *months* ago.

-Ilena Ayala

Quantum Reach

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:30:34 -0600, "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote:

>Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
>trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.
>
>

Sheesh, that's not very neighborly! I believe, with that statement,
you might've just invited more company.

--

Quantum Reach

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:45:42 -0600, "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote:

>I guess I stepped into that one.
>
>My apologies to Mr. r0ck for many of my references. Not all of them,
>however.
>
>I just wish people would have the balls to keep themselves identifiable. At
>least in Letters to the Editor you have to list your name and place of
>residence.
>

How does this, a newsgroup posting, qualify a comparison to a "Letter
to the Editor"? Do you have an Editor here? Is this a moderated
newsgroup?

--

Quantum Reach

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:52:24 -0600, "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote:

>Makes you wonder what ZPL is for, doesn't it? Not everything is "code"
>baby.
>
>And leave Cap alone. We like him here.
>

Where is here? I've been reading his drivel in AHM for quite some
time now. If you could keep your little yapping doggie on his leash
and keep him at home, perhaps we wouldn't be discussing this.

--

ZPL

Yea, he dragged r0ck over here to APF. But, he has had his shots.

"Quantum Reach" <QR740@none.nunya.net> wrote in message
news:3fe49b42.103099026@192.168.1.255_+++ATH0_...
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:52:24 -0600, "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >Makes you wonder what ZPL is for, doesn't it? Not everything is "code"
> >baby.
> >
> >And leave Cap alone. We like him here.
> >
>
> Where is here? I've been reading his drivel in AHM for quite some
> time now. If you could keep your little yapping doggie on his leash
> and keep him at home, perhaps we wouldn't be discussing this.
>
> --

Cap

the r0ck who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message news:<ZwnEb.18413$G9.17704@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...

> how can you make such an absurd claim? you don't even know me. Unlike
> John Alan Larkin, I have sex with my wife regularly. Unlike his
> defective wife, Karen, my wife can have kids. We have two.
>
> How many have you given to your husband?

As much time as you spend obsessing about me you obviously not only
don't get laid, but you probably have a tough time getting it up. So
far tonight I've seen you mention homosexuality, adultery, pedophilia,
and judging from your return addy you might even be curious about
necrophilia on top of it all.

You're quite a party animal now aren't you Rock-it-boi.
I'll bet you were quite happy to get some of those limp-dick remedies
in your email box, eh.
Different strokes, dude. Quit playing with your dick, and go to bed.

Quantum Reach

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:47:35 GMT, "Lin" <ktnil@woh.rr.com> wrote:

>
>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in message
>news:pEsEb.19851$G9.2984@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>> Lin wrote:
>>
>> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
>message
>> > news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>> >
>> >>Lin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
>> >>>
>> >>>>How many have you given to your husband?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>"Given"????????
>> >>
>> >>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......
>> >>>
>> >>>If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her somewhat, then I
>> >
>> > gots
>> >
>> >>>news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a flaming
>> >>>****heel).....
>> >>
>> >>"gots" ? you criticize me for using "given" yet you can't bothered to
>> >>use proper english in your reply? are you lazy or just stupid?
>> >
>> >
>> > Are you too lazy or just too stupid to capitolize the beginning of
>> > sentences, or proper names of countries & languages?
>>
>> ah, the english major can't spell. then you have no room to criticize
>> anybody about anything. hypocrite.
>
>Who's the English major? Not me. My degree's in Psychology.
>>
>> >
>> > And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.
>>
>> where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things? would you
>> like me to read my reply slowly so you can understand?
>
>To quote: "ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion."
>
>Why don't you find someplace where someone gives a **** about what you
>think?
>

LOL, I think he has. I hate to burst your bubble, but there are
PLENTY here who "gives a **** about" what he thinks.

--

Quantum Reach

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:55:05 -0800, swamp <swamp@xxxxspamadelphia.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:48:44 GMT, the r0ck who stole christmas
><r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote:
>
>>Isotope wrote:
>>
>>> "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message news:hjnEb.58237$cQ.20596@okepread05...
>>>
>>>>This is a public forum. We have stood by and for the most part ignored
>>>
>>> your
>>>
>>>>tirades concerning religion and war. You're wasting my bandwidth.
>>>
>>>
>>> And ignore it still.... it may be rubbish but it seems like harmless (at
>>> leat to ferrets in general) rubbish. It's like the Christina Aguilera in the
>>> nude spam posts.... worthless ****e to be passed over (ok, I concede... some
>>> people may like that kind of thing) The only reason I respond now is because
>>> this thread has got stupidly long and I am trying to catch up here in a rare
>>> free moment on ferret talk!!
>>>
>>> Isotope (damn it! And I made the stoopid thread even longer. Drat!)
>
>[snip]
>
>>in only two years. he knows MAGIC. *snort*
>
>Who's into magic? There's no such thing.
>
>>Cap, be honest...
>
>[snip]
>
>What does this have to do w/ anything on any ferret ng/board?
>
>Keep it on ahm,
>
>-- swamp

Like I said in a previous post, your little yapping lapdog cap has
been polluting AHM with his drivel for months now. Keep him on his
leash and you won't be inviting problems from your neighbors.

--

Quantum Reach

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:00:38 -0800, swamp <swamp@xxxxspamadelphia.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:45:45 GMT, the r0ck who stole christmas
><r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote:
>
>>you've got to be a complete moron to be hacked by Debbie.
>
>...and you've got to be a bigger moron to care..dot..dot..dot.
>
>Once again, time to clean the ferret cage,
>

BWAHAHAHA!!!! That almost sounds threatening.

--

The r0ck who st0le Christmas

MC wrote:

> Isotope wrote:
>
> > And ignore it still.... it may be rubbish but it seems like harmless (at
> > leat to ferrets in general) rubbish. It's like the Christina Aguilera in the
> > nude spam posts....
>
> HUH?
>
> WHERE??!! Wha'd I miss!!

figured as much. no taste. no class.

The r0ck who st0le Christmas

Ilena Ayala wrote:

> (Note to apfers from Ilena: more at bottom; ahmers bottom post)
>
> "Lin" <ktnil@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:f0qEb.7169$031.2477@fe3.columbus.rr.com...
> > I thought maybe it was Debbie, but even *it's* English is too good. Must
> be
> > one of her syphilitic buds from down on the docks.
> >
> > "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:7UpEb.59227$cQ.42787@okepread05...
> > > Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
> > > trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.
> > >
> > >
> > > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
> > message
> > > news:AToEb.18698$G9.17831@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > > > ZPL wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary
> who
> > > > > stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or
> > > purchase a
> > > > > higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work?
> > > >
> > > > who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
> > > > leave you at the alter?
> > > >
> > > > > And that
> > > > > statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that
> as
> > > he
> > > > > has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything
> > > else?
> > > >
> > > > you must be high...or off your meds.
> > > >
> > > > > Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.
> > > >
> > > > now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
> > > > sex in ages" zpl.
>
> It's a reg in ahm who goes by r0ck, not Debbie (trust me, she's up to no
> good elsewhere tonight).
>
> r0ck, what's up with this? Are you going to flirt with Debbie/Tracker now?
>
> Cap is one of the *good* guys. And you should not make any assumptions (or
> *cough* SE attempts *cough*) regarding info on any children he and/or his
> wife may or may not have.
>
> -Ilena Ayala

i don't associate with anybody who can't afford a real isp.

The r0ck who st0le Christmas

MC wrote:

> Damn it all...I have known about Jessica for quite some time...at least 3
years. BikerFerret has even met her.

omg. he named his ferret. do you talk to "bikerferret" too?

> Two ferrets that were here with me for a bit know her! LOL...she helps
with taking care of them! (Among others!)

oh really? what else does young miss jessica take care of? are you sure
you want to admit such a thing in a public forum? people have gone to jail
for doing that.

> Jessica..you are pretty figment of everyone's imagination.....HAHAHA!!
>
> MC (Yup...I am known by those letters...good as my name..have been for 30
plus years!)

who cares what nym you go by? as if you mattered to anybody. you could die
tomorrow and nobody would give a damn.

except maybe Cap...when he finds out you were sneaking a peek at his
daughter. you naughty thing.

Quantum Reach

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:29:24 -0600, "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote:

>Oh hell, come on in. You're right. Not neighborly.
>
>What is your opinion of raw feeding vs. kibble? If you raw feed, do your
>ferrets do a live kill or do you purchase pre-killed feeders?
>

LOL, my opinion is that the above posted stuff is meaningless to me.
My cats would do a "live kill" and eat your damn ferrets.

>"Quantum Reach" <QR740@none.nunya.net> wrote in message
>news:3fe297cd.102213443@192.168.1.255_+++ATH0_...
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:30:34 -0600, "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
>> >trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Sheesh, that's not very neighborly! I believe, with that statement,
>> you might've just invited more company.
>>
>> --
>

--

Quantum Reach

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:50:34 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
<ilena@compuserve.com> wrote:

>(Note to apfers from Ilena: more at bottom; ahmers bottom post)
>
>"Lin" <ktnil@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:f0qEb.7169$031.2477@fe3.columbus.rr.com...
>> I thought maybe it was Debbie, but even *it's* English is too good. Must
>be
>> one of her syphilitic buds from down on the docks.
>>
>> "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:7UpEb.59227$cQ.42787@okepread05...
>> > Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
>> > trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.
>> >
>> >
>> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
>> message
>> > news:AToEb.18698$G9.17831@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>> > > ZPL wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary
>who
>> > > > stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or
>> > purchase a
>> > > > higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work?
>> > >
>> > > who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
>> > > leave you at the alter?
>> > >
>> > > > And that
>> > > > statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that
>as
>> > he
>> > > > has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything
>> > else?
>> > >
>> > > you must be high...or off your meds.
>> > >
>> > > > Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.
>> > >
>> > > now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
>> > > sex in ages" zpl.
>
>It's a reg in ahm who goes by r0ck, not Debbie (trust me, she's up to no
>good elsewhere tonight).
>
>r0ck, what's up with this? Are you going to flirt with Debbie/Tracker now?
>
>Cap is one of the *good* guys. And you should not make any assumptions (or
>*cough* SE attempts *cough*) regarding info on any children he and/or his
>wife may or may not have.
>
>-Ilena Ayala

What's good about him? All he's done in AHM is reply to every post
that Tracker makes. Tracker is harmless. He, on the other hand, is
very close to being a usenet stalker.

--

Cap

Quantum Reach <QR740@none.nunya.net> wrote in message news:<3fe9a1f2.104811344@192.168.1.255_+++ATH0_>...
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:50:34 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
> <ilena@compuserve.com> wrote:
>
> >(Note to apfers from Ilena: more at bottom; ahmers bottom post)
> >
> >"Lin" <ktnil@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
> >news:f0qEb.7169$031.2477@fe3.columbus.rr.com...
> >> I thought maybe it was Debbie, but even *it's* English is too good. Must
> be
> >> one of her syphilitic buds from down on the docks.
> >>
> >> "ZPL" <ZPL@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:7UpEb.59227$cQ.42787@okepread05...
> >> > Well then get the **** off the ferret board. We have enough of our own
> >> > trolls to deal with, we do not need anymore from the hackers' boards.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
> message
> >> > news:AToEb.18698$G9.17831@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> >> > > ZPL wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Oh, so this is not Gary, of the Bart and Victoria posts. The Gary
> who
> >> > > > stated he could not afford to take his ferrets in for vet care or
> purchase a
> >> > > > higher quality feed for his animals, as he was out of work?
> >> > >
> >> > > who the hell are you talking about? is gary a spurned lover? did he
> >> > > leave you at the alter?
> >> > >
> >> > > > And that
> >> > > > statement about potatoes with green shoots, not worrying about that
> as
> he
> >> > > > has been eating them as he was not financially able to eat anything
> else?
> >> > >
> >> > > you must be high...or off your meds.
> >> > >
> >> > > > Oh, and by the way, Cap was wonderful.
> >> > >
> >> > > now you're a liar too? miss "my ovaries are broken and i haven't had
> >> > > sex in ages" zpl.
> >
> >It's a reg in ahm who goes by r0ck, not Debbie (trust me, she's up to no
> >good elsewhere tonight).
> >
> >r0ck, what's up with this? Are you going to flirt with Debbie/Tracker now?
> >
> >Cap is one of the *good* guys. And you should not make any assumptions (or
> >*cough* SE attempts *cough*) regarding info on any children he and/or his
> >wife may or may not have.
> >
> >-Ilena Ayala
>
> What's good about him? All he's done in AHM is reply to every post
> that Tracker makes. Tracker is harmless. He, on the other hand, is
> very close to being a usenet stalker.
>
> --

You are almost as funny as the Rock-it-boi.
You must his wife.

Cap

"The r0ck who st0le Christmas" <r0ck-no-spam@hannigan.is.my.son.and.i.wanna.post.hump.sharonb.until.her.head.falls.off.COTSE.COM> wrote in message news:cjBjaw==.554eea7f3f27de0046f1067f7cac06ea@1071820985.cotse.net...
> nothing personal but i've got orders to k/f you. don't bother replying.
> this will be my last post to you.

heh, heh, heh...
That's the best one of the entire pile.
Too damn funny...

Ilena Ayala

"Quantum Reach" <QR740@none.nunya.net> wrote in message
news:3fe9a1f2.104811344@192.168.1.255_+++ATH0_...
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:50:34 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
> <ilena@compuserve.com> wrote:
>
> >(Note to apfers from Ilena: more at bottom; ahmers bottom post)
<snip>
> >Cap is one of the *good* guys. And you should not make any assumptions
(or
> >*cough* SE attempts *cough*) regarding info on any children he and/or his
> >wife may or may not have.
> >
> >-Ilena Ayala
>
> What's good about him? All he's done in AHM is reply to every post
> that Tracker makes. Tracker is harmless. He, on the other hand, is
> very close to being a usenet stalker.

Sounds like you haven't got NEARLY enough background on some of the stunts
she's pulled.

:-(

-Ilena Ayala

Ilena Ayala

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:28:15 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
<ilena@compuserve.com> wrote:

>
>"Quantum Reach" <QR740@none.nunya.net> wrote in message
>news:3fe9a1f2.104811344@192.168.1.255_+++ATH0_...
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:50:34 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
>> <ilena@compuserve.com> wrote:
>>
>> >(Note to apfers from Ilena: more at bottom; ahmers bottom post)
><snip>
>> >Cap is one of the *good* guys. And you should not make any assumptions
>(or
>> >*cough* SE attempts *cough*) regarding info on any children he and/or his
>> >wife may or may not have.
>> >
>> >-Ilena Ayala
>>
>> What's good about him? All he's done in AHM is reply to every post
>> that Tracker makes. Tracker is harmless. He, on the other hand, is
>> very close to being a usenet stalker.
>
>Sounds like you haven't got NEARLY enough background on some of the stunts
>she's pulled.
>
>:-(

No joke... if EVER there was a usenet stalker, it's the kook Debbie
Gambriel. That piece of trash deserves any and everything she gets.

ZVI WOLFE

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:39:38 -0500 (EST), in alt.hackers.malicious,
"The r0ck who st0le Christmas"
<r0ck-no-spam@hannigan.is.my.son.and.i.wanna.post.hump.sharonb.until.her.head.falls.off.COTSE.COM>
wrote:

-> ZVI WOLFE wrote:
->
-> > On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:38:29 GMT, in alt.hackers.malicious, the
r0ck
-> > who stole christmas <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote:
-> >
-> > -> Lin wrote:
-> > ->
-> > -> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
wrote
-> > in message
-> > -> > news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
-> > -> >
-> > -> >>Lin wrote:
-> > -> >>
-> > -> >>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
-> > -> >>>
-> > -> >>>>How many have you given to your husband?
-> > -> >>>
-> > -> >>>
-> > -> >>>"Given"????????
-> > -> >>
-> > -> >>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
-> > -> >>
-> >
-> > <snip>
-> >
-> > -> >
-> > -> > And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.
-> > ->
-> > -> where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things?
would
-> > you
-> > -> like me to read my reply slowly so you can understand?
-> >
-> > FYI, a lark is a bird. Dip****.
->
->
-> well...golly gee! how about that! the english major who can't
spell can
-> lookup a word in a dictionary. you should try reading more. a
lark can
-> also refer to a prank or a joke...which...wait for it...wait for
it...
->
-> you are!

Nice save.

->
-> now, crawl back into that diseased cesspool you call a home and
bring me the
-> other clown. you bore me.

Translation: Whew! That was close! I need someone weaker to pick on.

: : b r i a n : :

Ilena Ayala wrote:
> (not caring if r0ck can't see this)
>
> Just pointing out that when faced with the truth of the matter, r0ck chose
> to cover his eyes with his k/f. (I can't see! I can't see! The truth
> doesn't matter 'cause I can't *see* it!!!)
>
> "Orders to k/f" me? LMAO. I can only wonder from what higher authority that
> came from. I'm going to lose sleep over that one...Not.
>
> -Ilena Ayala
>
I find it hilarious that someone would killfile somebody, and make posts
about them. Why make the post in the first place?

--
Brian

Lin

"The r0ck who st0le Christmas"
<r0ck-no-spam@hannigan.is.my.son.and.i.wanna.post.hump.sharonb.until.her.hea
d.falls.off.COTSE.COM> wrote in message
news:cjBjaw==.7ab56e6101fb6d4856a53648dc8a9c2f@1071808983.cotse.net...
> Lin wrote:
>
> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
message
> > news:pEsEb.19851$G9.2984@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > > Lin wrote:
> > >
> > > > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote in
> > message
> > > > news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > > >
> > > >>Lin wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>How many have you given to your husband?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>"Given"????????
> > > >>
> > > >>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......
> > > >>>
> > > >>>If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her somewhat,
then I
> > > >
> > > > gots
> > > >
> > > >>>news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a flaming
> > > >>>****heel).....
> > > >>
> > > >>"gots" ? you criticize me for using "given" yet you can't bothered
to
> > > >>use proper english in your reply? are you lazy or just stupid?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you too lazy or just too stupid to capitolize the beginning of
> > > > sentences, or proper names of countries & languages?
> > >
> > > ah, the english major can't spell. then you have no room to criticize
> > > anybody about anything. hypocrite.
> >
> > Who's the English major? Not me. My degree's in Psychology.
>
> When did Devry start giving out Psych degrees?

WTF is "Devry"? Hate to tell ya, but the college I went to ain't no stinken
little community college. I doubt you could get accepted to the college I
went to for my Bachelors - or where I started my PhD - much less afford it.
>
> Honey, if it says "made in taiwan" on the back of your "degree", you
should
> get your money back.
>
> > > > And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.
> > >
> > > where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things? would you
> > > like me to read my reply slowly so you can understand?
> >
> > To quote: "ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion."
> >
> > Why don't you find someplace where someone gives a **** about what you
> > think?
>
> see the other thread about a lark...though it's good to know you're as
> uncivilized and dim-witted as that ZVI heathen.
>
> you should know better...with your psych degree. *guffaw*

Your usage of the word "lark" was as a noun, not a verb. I don't need an
English degree to know that, since I learned it in grade school.

You're really a boring, insecure little ******, aren't you?

ZVI WOLFE

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:37:24 GMT, in alt.hackers.malicious, Quantum
Reach <QR740@none.nunya.net> wrote:

-> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:47:35 GMT, "Lin" <ktnil@woh.rr.com> wrote:
->
-> >
-> >"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net> wrote
in message
-> >news:pEsEb.19851$G9.2984@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
-> >> Lin wrote:
-> >>
-> >> > "the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
wrote in
-> >message
-> >> > news:BRoEb.18689$G9.1711@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
-> >> >
-> >> >>Lin wrote:
-> >> >>
-> >> >>>"the r0ck who stole christmas" <r0ck@cotse.DOT.DOT.DOT.net>
-> >> >>>
-> >> >>>>How many have you given to your husband?
-> >> >>>
-> >> >>>
-> >> >>>"Given"????????
-> >> >>
-> >> >>ah...another lark chimes in with her worthless opinion.
-> >> >>
-> >> >>
-> >> >>
-> >> >>>Don't know much about bi-o-lo-gy.......
-> >> >>>
-> >> >>>If your wife has "given" you 2, w/out you helping her
somewhat, then I
-> >> >
-> >> > gots
-> >> >
-> >> >>>news for you (other than the obvious fact that you're a
flaming
-> >> >>>****heel).....
-> >> >>
-> >> >>"gots" ? you criticize me for using "given" yet you can't
bothered to
-> >> >>use proper english in your reply? are you lazy or just
stupid?
-> >> >
-> >> >
-> >> > Are you too lazy or just too stupid to capitolize the
beginning of
-> >> > sentences, or proper names of countries & languages?
-> >>
-> >> ah, the english major can't spell. then you have no room to
criticize
-> >> anybody about anything. hypocrite.
-> >
-> >Who's the English major? Not me. My degree's in Psychology.
-> >>
-> >> >
-> >> > And BTW - I'm not a bird, dilrod.
-> >>
-> >> where did anybody mention a bird? are you seeing things? would
you
-> >> like me to read my reply s